PAPER REVIEW PANEL  











The provisional panel tasked with reviewing paper submissions includes leading information security experts from around the world.
 

Name

Company/Affiliation

 Country

 

Hanifa Abdullah

University of South Africa

South Africa

Sampson Asare

Computer Science Department, University of Botswana

Botswana

Joachim Biskup

University of Dortmund

Germany

Elmarie Biermann

Private

South Africa

Hettie Booysen

Private

South Africa

Reinhardt Botha

Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University

South Africa

Jacqui Chetty

University of Johannesburg

South Africa

KP Chow

University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong

Stelvio Cimato

University of Milano

Italy

Nathan Clarke

University of Plymouth

UK

Marijke Coetzee

University of Johannesburg

South Africa

Philip Craiger

University of Central Florida

USA

Evan Dembsky

University of South Africa

South Africa

Paul Dowland

University of Plymouth

UK

Lynette Drevin

North-West University

South Africa

Stelios Dristas

Athens University

Greece

David Ellefsen

University of Johannesburg

South Africa

Jan Eloff

University of Pretoria

South Africa

Mariki Eloff

University of South Africa

South Africa

Sheikh Muhammad Farhan

University of Engineering and Technology

Pakistan

Eduardo Fernandez

Florida Atlantic University

USA

Simone Fischer-Hubner

Karlstad University

Sweden

Stephen Flowerday

University of Fort Hare

South Africa

Steven Furnell

University of Plymouth

UK

Dieter Gollmann

TU Hamburg-Harburg

Germany

Stefanos Gritzalis

University of the Aegean

Greece

Talania Grobler

University of Johannesburg

South Africa

Marthie Grobler

CSIR

South Africa

Barry Irwin

Rhodes University

South Africa

Christian Damsgaard Jensen

Technical University of Denmark

Denmark

Erland Jonsson

University of Gothenburg

Sweden

Sokratis Katsikas

University of the Aegean

Greece

Anne Kayem

University of Cape Town

South Africa

Elmarie Kritzinger

University of South Africa

South Africa

Hennie Kruger North-West University South Africa

Michael Kyobe

University of Cape Town

South Africa

Les Labuschagne

University of Johannesburg

South Africa

Stefan Lindskog

Karlstad University

Sweden

Dennis Longley

Queensland University of Technology

Australia

Buks Louwrens

Nedbank

South Africa

Marianne Loock

University of South Africa

South Africa

Svetla Nikova

University of Twente

The Netherlands  

Kennedy Njenga

University of Johannesburg

South Africa

Martin Olivier

University of Pretoria

South Africa

Rolf Oppliger

eSECURITY Technologies

Switzerland

Sylvia Osborn

University of Western Ontario

Canada

Keshnee Padaychee

University of South Africa

South Africa

Mauricio Papa

University of Tulsa

USA

Guenther Pernul

University of Regensburg

Germany

Dalenca Pottas

Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University

South Africa

Hartmunt Pohl

Bonn-Rhine-Sieg University

Germany

Laurette Pretorius

University of South Africa

South Africa

Indrajit Ray

Colorado State University

USA

Andrew Rutherford

Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University

South Africa

Reijo Savola

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

Finland

Elme Smith

University of South Africa

South Africa

Adrie Stander

University of Cape Town

South Africa

Bobby Tait

University of Johannesburg

South Africa

Barend Taute CSIR

South Africa

Stephanie Teufel University of Fribourg Switzerland

Bill Tsoumas

Athens University

Greece

Ulrich Ultes Nitsche

University of Fribourg

Switzerland

Alta Van der Merwe

CSIR

South Africa

Namosha Veersamy

CSIR

South Africa

Hein Venter

University of Pretoria

South Africa

Rossouw von Solms

Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University

South Africa

Basie von Solms

University of Johannesburg

South Africa

Edgar Weippl

Secure Business Austria

Austria

Stephen Wolthusen

Norwegian Information Security Lab

Norway

Louise Yngstrom

Stockholm University

Sweden

Marek Zielinski

SAP Research

South Africa

Alf Zugenmaier

Munich University

Germany

(Reviewer list updated 5 April 2011)

Review process

ISSA uses a double blind peer-review process to ensure the quality of submissions before acceptance. Authors initially submit abstracts to determine if the paper meets the goals and fits into the theme of the conference. The ISSA Program Committee assesses each submission for relevance and fit. Authors are then notified whether their abstracts were accepted, and if so, invited to submit a full paper for peer review.

On the due date, authors submit full papers, anonymised by the authors for the double blind review process. Each paper goes through an administrative review to confirm that the paper conforms to the specifications. If a paper does not meet the requirements, the author is asked to resubmit the paper.

A Review Committee (the list shown above) is invited to participate, consisting of both local and international experts in the field of Information Security. A process is followed by the Program Committee to allocate papers to reviewers based on their area of expertise. Reviewers are subject matter experts, of which over 50% are international. Reviewers usually have 5 or 6 categories that they are willing to review against. Each reviewer will establish the number of papers they can review in a specific time period and are allowed to bid on the papers they want to review. An automated process allocated papers to each reviewer according to their preferences.

Each paper is reviewed by a minimum of two reviewers in a double blind review process. Papers are reviewed and rated on a 10 point system with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent as follows:
• Originallity (1-10)
• Significance (1-10)
• Technical quality (1-10)
• Relevance (1-10)
• Presentation (1-10)
• Overall Rating (1-10)

Reviewers’ confidence in their own rating is also taken into account by the algorithm that calculates the final score. Reviewers are encouraged to make anonymous suggestions to the author(s) of the paper.

Based on the final score (1-10), a paper with 5 or below points can be recommended for a poster/research-in-progress session and a 9 to 10 point paper can be put in the “best paper” category. An acceptance rate of between 30% and 40% is expected for the conference.

Authors are notified of the outcome of the review process which includes the anonymous suggestions and recommendations of the reviewers. Authors then have to submit the final version of the paper that will then be included in the formal conference proceedings. The proceedings are published electronically in IEEE Explore as well as on a CD with an ISBN number. All proceedings from all previous ISSA conferences are also available here.